AMADO MACASAET: THE PARTY'S OVER FOR DE
LIMA
MANILA, AUGUST 16, 2012
(MALAYA) Written by AMADO P. MACASAET ('Little does De
Lima know that she is effectively suggesting that President Aquino should
continue fighting for her. I do not think he will.')
AS the song goes, the party's over and it's time to call it a day. For
Justice Secretary Leila De Lima, that means her ambition to become Chief
Justice.
Secretary De Lima knows that the Judicial and Bar Council has has submitted
to the President the names of eight candidates who garnered the minimum votes of
five from the 8-member council. Acting Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio was given
7 votes, and Mrs. De Lima was not one of them.
As a matter of fact, the JBC disqualified her in spite of the pressure
exerted by the lawyers of President Aquino to "insert" her name by a process she
herself should abhor.
The JBC stood pat on its policy to disqualify any aspirant facing
administrative charges.
Thus the selection process has ended.
The Justice Secretary knows that only too well. But she could not stop
blaming what she described as a conspiracy by the Integrated Bar of the
Philippines, the Supreme Court and the JBC to disqualify her.
She sings the old tune of charging the SC with bias for dismissing the
disbarment cases against two other aspirants who happen to be members of the
High Tribunal – Acting Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio and Associate Justice
Maria Lourdes P. Sereno.
Mrs. De Lima claims that SC acted with dispatch to dismiss the disbarment
cases against the two justices while her motion to the JBC to summarily drop her
own case went under investigation instead.
How many times must we say that the members of the Supreme Court may be
removed from office only by impeachment? Charging any of them with disbarment is
intended to have their license to practice law withdrawn.
Without a license, the accused are automatically removed from office. But
impeachment is the process of removing any of them. The "conspiracy" against De
Lima is the fact that she is not a justice of the Supreme Court, but a Secretary
of Justice, who may be investigated for disbarment on the complaint of anybody
at any time.
Whatever De Lima says now about the nomination process has no value at all.
The processed has been observed.
Little does De Lima know that she is effectively suggesting that President
Aquino should continue fighting for her. I do not think he will. He has, like a
man, accepted the decision of the JBC.
De Lima does not seem to appreciate the lengths that President Aquino went to
for her. The final result is embarrassing the President since his efforts to use
pressure failed.
De Lima should apologize to the President because he went out of his way to
qualify her. She does not seem to have a mind to. On the contrary, she might be
putting the name of the President on the spot in the sense that her persistence
may be interpreted by many as authorized by the President.
I would not suspect it is. On the contrary, President Aquino has accepted the
reality that although he was embarrassed, he made democracy work by trying –
although failing – to bend the JBC in favor of De Lima.
The JBC denied him. That is a clear manifestation of independence and a
lesson for the President not to use his awesome powers where the Constitution
is involved.
Mrs. De Lima should likewise remember that three men, including Executive
Secretary Paquito Ochoa, lobbied in the IBP to investigate her. That means they
did not want the JBC to qualify her.
This particular point indicates that the President and his men cannot get
their act together. He was disobeyed.
The situation got so confused after Senator Escudero, true to his opposition
to De Lima, declared that the JBC need not meet to disqualify the secretary of
justice. He said the body has always rejected a nominee who is facing charges.
The signals got mixed up. Senator Escudero had dinner with the President on
Monday, Aug. 6. He wanted to tell him not to interfere with De Lima's problems.
But Escudero is said to have left Malacañang convinced by the President that
he would work for the inclusion of De Lima. That's how far the President went
for his secretary of justice.
Yet the JBC rejected her.
The rejection was a dark chapter not on the career of De Lima but on the
reputation and character of President Aquino. Why should De Lima continue
blaming the Supreme Court and the JBC for not including her as a nominee?
If the President has accepted the reality that the JBC and the IBP are
unbendable when they feel that what they are doing is duty that sits with law,
why can't the likes of Leila de Lima have the virtue of humility to move on?
She is not helping the President. Cabinet members have the duty to protect
the dignity of the Office of the President. Mr. Aquino must be saved from the
embarrassment he got trying to have De Lima as Chief Justice.
The President must likewise be admired for the humility of accepting defeat.
It is a trait not in the person of Mrs. De Lima. The other way of looking at
it is the President had the "good fortune" of being rebuffed. I cannot imagine
how Mrs. De Lima would behave if she had been appointed Chief Justice.
We have been blessed by her rejection. We have been blessed by the lesson
that the President might learn from the experience of being rebuffed. He now
knows that the powers of the President have limits.
Most of all, the unfortunate incidents have the positive effect of seeing the
law working as it should in the case of the JBC and the IBP. It is mistakes that
make a man more careful.
Chief News Editor: Sol Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2012 by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All
rights reserved
PHILIPPINE
HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/phnotweet
This is the PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE (PHNO) Mailing List.
To stop receiving our news items, please send a blank e-mail addressed to: phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Please visit our homepage at: http://www.newsflash.org/
(c) Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
phno-digest@yahoogroups.com
phno-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/