CAROL P. ARAULLO BLOG: CLAIMING FALSE
CREDIT
MANILA, JULY 3, 2012
(PHNO BLOG WATCH) BY Dr. Carol P. Araullo
(photo) Blog (Streetwise: Progressive views on Philippine and
international issues published in BusinessWorld, the Philippines' leading
business newspaper, and more.)
You know something is terribly wrong with the Philippine economy when
Malacañang and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) boast of our being
"international creditors" for the first time, and attribute this to "sound
fundamentals and management" of the economy.
They try to conjure the illusion that the country is now awash with so much
cash that it can afford to contribute a billion dollars to an international fund
managed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to succor European countries in
financial distress.
And, as if that were not enough good news, they add that Filipinos need not
worry about losing so much money; in fact we stand to gain more from interest,
since the contribution is in fact a loan. What the government is not telling us
is that the Philippines has been classified as an "IMF creditor" by virtue of a
narrow technical definition that an IMF member has a "creditor position" if its
holdings in the Fund can be used to provide financial assistance to other
members.
But this is vastly different from jumping to the conclusion that the
Philippines has actually become a "creditor nation".
Determining whether one is a "net creditor" entails comparing the country's
lending with its borrowing. Foreign exchange reserves, no matter how high, are
not the measure for this. If positive reserves were the criterion, then the
Philippines could claim to have achieved the status of a "creditor nation" since
the time of the Marcos martial law years when our external debt was growing by
leaps and bounds.
Nothing has changed even with the label "IMF creditor" attached to the
Philippines. We remain a heavily indebted nation (US$61.7 billion as of end
2011); highly dependent on foreign sources of financing primarily to shore up
the budget deficit averaging some P300 billion a year. Debt service payments
grew by US$ 100 million to US$7.3 billion last year.
It must be clarified at this point that the Gross International Reserves
(GIR) held by the BSP is in the form of IMF deposits, other foreign currency
deposits elsewhere, gold, Special Drawing Rights (SDR), US Treasury bills and
the like. It is from the deposit of the Philippines/BSP with the IMF (also
called "IMF reserve position") that the US$1 billion has been made available for
loan to EU countries in deep financial crisis.
While it is true that these transactions earn interest and the funds can
still be technically counted as part of the Philippines' international reserves,
a point can be raised about how much the country is losing in terms of lower
interest on the IMF loan as compared to other placements with potentially higher
yields.
Progressive party list representatives, trade union and peasant leaders - all
opponents of government's prioritization of debt servicing over social services
- as well as two Senators and several opinion writers have asked how the BSP
(and the Aquino government for that matter) could have the effrontery to "lend"
money to the international lender-of-last-resort that is the IMF when the
country remains a perennial heavy borrower itself.
These critics ask pointedly whether the money - P43 billion - could be better
spent on health, housing, and education for impoverished and barely surviving
Filipino families; for land reform and support for an agricultural sector in
continuing decline; for job generation as well as infusing life into an anemic
economy battered by heightened domestic and global economic crises. In other
words, for the government to come to the aid of the majority of the Philippine
population rather than contribute to an IMF bail-out fund for heavily indebted
countries in the Euro zone.
Again, what the government is not telling us is that the Gross International
Reserves (GIR) from which the loan came, and which the BSP boasts to have
reached a record high of USD 76.534B, consists of foreign assets that cannot be
used in the same way as the National Government fund.
That is, the GIR may not be allocated for regular government programs and
projects in order for it to serve three functions: for intervention in the
foreign exchange market, for creditworthiness, and for emergencies. A country's
GIR indicates its ability to repay foreign debt and to defend its currency from
speculative attack. It is used as a yardstick to set the country's credit
ratings.
So why is the Aquino government foisting the false impression on the public
that the BSP has so much money in its vaults that could be made available to the
government to uplift the people's dire socio-economic conditions?
Unfortunately, we can only come up with the conclusion that government needs
to justify the BSP's accession that the country contribute to the IMF bail-out
fund by (1) claiming that the economy is so robust and well-managed that the
Philippines can now boast of being in a position to lend to other countries and
(2) arguing that the loan is a worthwhile humanitarian investment and
demonstrates the Philippines' sense of responsibility to the international
community.
Moreover, the announcement of BSP Governor Tetangco raises even more
questions: 1. Does the BSP have a free rein on handling/managing the entire GIR?
What check-and-balance is in place to ascertain that the GIR is being managed
properly? Who decides, for example, and how, on the investments and loans being
entered into by the BSP from the GIR? Does this not, after all, belong to the
Filipino people as much as the national funds which only Congress can decide to
apportion?
2. Was the loan voluntary or mandatory? While the BSP statement implies that
the loan was voluntary and undertaken as a contribution to the IMF's efforts "to
address the current financial crisis" and "help other countries saddled with
financial problems", it is not farfetched that the loan is in fact obligatory
or, at the least, is being given under pressure, considering that the Philippine
economy continues to be quite dependent on the good graces of international
financial institutions such as the IMF and World Bank.
3. Finally, will the IMF fund to which the Filipino people have been made to
contribute USD 1B, really be used for the benefit of the people of the
distressed countries in the Euro zone? Or will it again, like the trillions of
stimulus funds, be used to bail out big banks and monopoly conglomerates that
caused the financial crisis in the first place, or to pressure governments in
distressed countries to follow IMF-dictated policies that will only benefit such
big banks and conglomerates? Has not the IMF and WB been the main instruments,
in the first place, in carrying out the neoliberal policies that have brought
about the global financial and economic crisis?
All said, a closer and more critical look must be taken into the management
not only of the country's financial resources, but also of the so-called
economic "fundamentals" -- the neoliberal framework on which the policies and
decisions by the BSP and economic managers are anchored.
For the grandiose claims that the country is finally free from foreign
impositions and restrictions after having exited from the IMF Post-Program
Monitoring Arrangement (when the BSP prepaid all Philippine outstanding debts
from the IMF in 2006) are now matched by stupendous claims that we are, at long
last, a "creditor nation". # Published in Business World
29-30 June 2012
Chief News Editor: Sol Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2012 by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All
rights reserved
PHILIPPINE
HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/phnotweet
This is the PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE (PHNO) Mailing List.
To stop receiving our news items, please send a blank e-mail addressed to: phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Please visit our homepage at: http://www.newsflash.org/
(c) Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
phno-digest@yahoogroups.com
phno-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
PH Headline News Online. Copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved