CARPIO, 3 OTHERS AUTOMATIC NOMINEES FOR CJ POST; COUNCIL MEETS 
MONDAY
MANILA, JUNE 1, 2012 
(TRIBUNE) Acting Supreme Court Chief Justice Antonio Carpio 
(photo) and three other senior officials of the high court are in the 
running for the next chief magistrate post following the removal of Chief 
Justice Renato Corona's removal by the Senate impeachment court. 
Carpio has declined a nomination for the post during the last days of the 
Arroyo administration, citing his position that an appointment to the high court 
by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was covered by the ban on midnight 
appointments. 
SC acting spokesman Ma. Victoria Gleoresty Guerra said Carpio, who will also 
sit as acting ex-officio chair of the eight-man Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) 
tasked to vet nominees to judicial posts, called for the meeting. 
"The JBC confirmed that the CJ vacancy is on the agenda for discussion," she 
told reporters in an interview. 
"The JBC will screen the nominees and then come up with an official shortlist 
where the President will handpick the next CJ," she added. 
[PHOTOS - LEFT TO RIGHT: Associate Justices Presbitero 
Velasco Jr, Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, Arturo Brion, Diosdado 
Peralta]
Guerra also clarified that "outsiders from the judiciary" or those who are 
qualified but do not belong to any of the judicial institutions may also be 
nominated for Chief Justice. 
"There is no prohibition against outsiders as long as they comply with the 
constitutional requirements," she stressed. 
The last real "outsider" or a lawyer chosen to be Chief Justice not coming 
from the ranks of incumbent magistrates of the SC was during Japanese occupation 
when the occupation government appointed Jose Yulo as Chief Justice. 
Yulo, a member of the Liberal Party, headed the legislative department before 
the Philippine government fell. 
He succeeded Jose Abad Santos as Chief Justice after the latter was executed 
for refusing to collaborate with the enemy. 
Guerra said the appointment should be made within 90 days from vacancy of the 
top judiciary post last May 22 when the Senate sitting as impeachment court 
convicted Corona of culpable violation of the Constitution and betrayal of 
public trust. 
Aside from Carpio and four other most senior magistrates of the SC – 
Associate Justices Presbitero Velasco Jr., Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, Arturo 
Brion and Diosdado Peralta are automatically nominated for the post. 
Malacañang, for its part, said President Aquino may take part in the process 
of choosing the next chief magistrate when the formal process kicks off. 
In a press briefing, deputy presidential spokesman Abigail Valte said there 
was no law that prevents the President or any Filipino citizen from taking part 
in the selection process and making a choice on whom he sees fit to become the 
next Chief Justice for the high tribunal. 
"Ideally, yes because it's an open nomination process. So anybody can 
nominate. And in the same vein, anybody can make an opposition to the list of 
nominees," she added. 
The Palace official, however, clarified that it would still be the JBC which 
would play a significant role as it is the JBC panel that screens, validates and 
makes a final recommendation to the President of the short-listed nominees from 
where the appointing authority would be made to choose and appoint. 
Asked if the President was open to appointing an outsider to become the next 
Chief Justice, Valte said: "That will depend on the shortlist to be 
transmitted." 
But Malacañang would face a tough task in replacing Corona as a number of 
senators who handed down the guilty verdict indicated that they had high 
expectations as to the basis of Aquino's appointment of the new chief 
magistrate. 
For one, Sen. Francis Pangilinan, demanded that the so-called screening 
committee's deliberations on who should end up on the President's shortlist 
should be open to the public. 
Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano openly expressed his opposition to the 
idea of picking from among the present crop of "politicians" Corona's 
replacement as he felt that it would stir speculations that the image of the SC 
was tainted with partisan politics. 
"I strongly recommend against (appointing) politicians. There should be a new 
new paradigm of transparency and accountability. While there are a number of 
good politicians, there may be some who will say I'm in no position to say this 
because I'm also a politician, the point is this will give a message to the 
public that the next Chief Justice was an ally (of the President)," he said. 
"The problem with politicians, we're partisan and people know who are your 
allies, your supporters," he added. 
Should Aquino name a politician, Cayetano said it cannot but create a doubt 
among the public on every decision the appointee will make. 
Cayetano saw no problem in the President's choosing from the ranks of his 
colleagues such as Senators Francis Escudero and Franklin Drilon as they are 
good choices, "but as I said we have to go beyond the individual qualifications 
and integrity." 
Just as the sessions of both the Senate and the House of Representatives are 
open to the public, so, too, should the proceedings of the JBC made public, 
Pangilinan said. 
"We have seen how critical it is to have a Chief Justice with integrity and 
independence. We cannot have a selection process for the next Chief Justice that 
is shrouded in secrecy and mystery. If there is any lesson to be learned in the 
non-disclosure to the public of the SALns (statement of assets, liability and 
net worth) of the justices, it is that it becomes open to abuse. The right of 
the people to information on matters of public interest is mandated by the 
Constitution. The selection process for all judges and justices begins with the 
JBC, hence, the reforms should start there," hesaid. 
[PHOTO - Logo of the Supreme Court/JBC]
http://jbc.judiciary.gov.ph/ 
Public access should not be limited to the deliberations but should be given 
to meetings and the voting on the final list of JBC's nominees, the senator 
stressed. 
Sen. Edgardo Angara agreed with Cayetano that Drilon and Escudero were more 
than qualified to replace Corona and that party affiliation is not a ground for 
disqualification. 
"It's not even a ground for excluding yourself. But you must really choose 
the leader of that body with wisdom, uprightness but most of all one who can 
look beyond," he said. 
Both Angara and Escudero said that in the event that Carpio would be 
nominated as "candidate," he should inhibit from the deliberations of the JBC, 
of which he is currently the chair, being the acting SC chief. 
"According to the JBC, the SC and the law creating JBC, whoever heads the SC 
automatically heads the JBC, whether as OIC or acting, he is head. Therefore, 
there will be no void in the law. To me, there seems to be no problem. 
Otherwise, there will be perpetual paralysis. Walang Chief Justice, walang head 
ang JBC then the JBC cannot convene. The JBC cannot nominate the Chief Justice. 
But that's just one theory. Whoever heads the SC ipso facto automatically heads 
the JBC. Therefore the JBC is going to be operational," he said. 
Escudero said if Carpio were going to be a nominee or an applicant, "he would 
inhibit himself anyway from participating in the JBC deliberations given that he 
is a potential (replacement), if he applies or if he is nomited, if he accepts." 
The Constitution requires the Chief Justice to be at least 40 years of age, a 
judge in a court of record for at least 15 years or engaged in the practice of 
law in the Philippines for the same period and a person of proven competence, 
integrity, probity and independence. 
After receiving a final list of nominees and applicants, the JBC will solicit 
from the public manifestations of support or oppositions to the candidates. 
Benjamin B. Pulta, Fernan J. Angeles and Angie M. Rosales 
FROM WIKIPEDIA
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines: Incumbent 
Antonio Carpio since May 29, 2012 – in acting capacity
Style : 
His/Her Honorable 
Appointer : Presidential appointment upon nomination by the Judicial 
and Bar Council 
Term length : Retirement at the age 70 
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines (Filipino: 
Punong Mahistrado ng Kataas-taasang Hukuman ng Pilipinas) presides over the 
Supreme Court of the Philippines and is the highest judicial officer of the 
government of the Philippines. The position is currently occupied by Acting 
Chief Justice Antonio Carpio.
Duties 
The power to appoint the Chief Justice lies with the President, who makes the 
selection from a list of 3 nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council. 
There is no material difference in the process of selecting a Chief Justice 
from that in the selection of Associate Justices. As with the other Justices of 
the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice is obliged to retire upon reaching the age 
of 70, otherwise there is no term limit for the Chief Justice. 
The Constitution does not ascribe any formal role to the Chief Justice other 
than as an ex-officio Chairman of the Judicial and Bar Council and as the 
presiding officer in any impeachment trial of the President. 
The Chief Justice is also required to personally certify every decision that 
is rendered by the Court. 
He or she carries only 1 vote out of 15 in the Court, and is generally 
regarded, vis-a-vis the other Justices, as the primus inter pares rather than as 
the administrative superior of the other members of the Court. 
Still, the influence a Chief Justice may bear within the Court and judiciary, 
and on the national government cannot be underestimated. 
In the public eye, any particular Supreme Court is widely identified with the 
identity of the incumbent Chief Justice, hence appellations such as "The 
Concepcion Court", "The Fernando Court", or "The Puno Court". Moreover, the 
Chief Justice usually retains high public visibility, unlike the Associate 
Justices who tend to labor in relative anonymity, with exceptions such as 
Associate Justice J.B.L. Reyes in the 1950s to 1970s. 
By tradition, it is also the Chief Justice who swears into office the 
President of the Philippines. 
One notable deviation from that tradition came in 1986. Due to the 
exceptional political circumstances culminating in the People Power Revolution, 
on February 25, 1986, Corazon Aquino took her oath of office as President before 
then Associate Justice Claudio Teehankee in San Juan just minutes before 
Ferdinand Marcos took his own oath of office also as President before Chief 
Justice Ramon Aquino. Marcos fled into exile later that night.
Chief News Editor: Sol 
Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2012 by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE 
NEWS ONLINE 
All rights reserved 
PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS 
ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE 		 	   		  
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/phnotweet
This is the PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE (PHNO) Mailing List. 
To stop receiving our news items, please send a blank e-mail addressed to: phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Please visit our homepage at: http://www.newsflash.org/
(c) Copyright 2009.  All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/
<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
    phno-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    phno-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




