SUPREME COURT
MANILA, MARCH 1, 2012 (INQUIRER) Outlook By: Rigoberto Tiglao - It
is not at all surprising that Justice Secretary Leila de Lima kept on invoking
Supreme Court Associate Justice Lourdes Sereno's narratives as her basis for
claiming that Chief Justice Renato Corona was biased for former President
Macapagal-Arroyo. Nor is it surprising that Malacañang wants her to testify in
trial, and that the presidential spokesman remarked that the chief justice
President Aquino wants is "someone like Maylou Sereno."
Sereno, Mr. Aquino's first appointee to the Supreme Court, has practically
acted as his—and even his clan's—agent in the tribunal, unabashedly trying to
get it to do whatever he wants. If you want a preview of how Aquino would like
to mold the Supreme Court, check out Sereno's track record in the high court.
Sereno's appointment was unexpected, as she was at the bottom of the list the
Judicial and Bar Council submitted to Mr. Aquino, despite intensive lobbying by
JBC members De Lima and Rep. Niel Tupas.
A respected appeals court justice topped the list, and fellow columnist Raul
Pangalangan and Comelec member Rene Sarmiento had more votes—and
qualifications—than her. (The latter two could still make it to the Court though
within Aquino's term, if the impeachment court removes the Chief Justice—if it
pleases the President and before that De Lima, that is.)
Sereno though was Aquino's college buddy; she is on a nickname-basis with the
yellow crowd, including his minions, such as his spokesman. In her 18 months in
the Court, Sereno has unabashedly pushed for Mr. Aquino's agenda in the high
court even to the point of scandalizing her colleagues. Judge for yourself:
Justice Antonio Carpio inhibited himself from the Hacienda Luisita case, on
grounds that the firm he founded over a decade ago is indirectly involved in the
controversy. Sereno would have none of that ethical standard. After all, the
case would determine whether Aquino's Cojuangco clan goes bankrupt or not.
Sereno's dissenting opinion for the Court's July 2011 decision—nearly
book-length at 39,000 words, longer than the main ruling—was practically a legal
brief for the clan's claim for an astronomical compensation. Sereno repeated her
arguments—which would mean P10-billion payment to the Cojuangcos—in another
kilometric dissenting opinion for the Court's November 2011 resolution.
The clan's lawyers practically had little left for them to do, with their
pleading in the Court simply invoking Sereno's opinions.
Sereno's shameless advocacy of the Cojuangcos' claims appalled her colleagues
so much that Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro angrily—and
unprecedentedly—wrote in the Court document: "I maintain my vehement
disagreement with Justice Sereno's opinion which will put the land beyond the
capacity of the farmers to pay, based on her strained
construction/interpretation."
Sereno's voting and opinions in the Court have invariably reflected
Malacañang's positions with her "dissenting opinions" reading like extended
versions of Mr. Aquino's or his yellow forces' manifestos:
On the Court's ruling against Aquino's Truth Commission, she wrote: "(The
Court) effectively tolerates impunity for graft and corruption." She mimics the
style of yellow opinion writers when she titled a section: "Who's Afraid of the
Truth?" Echoing the Manichean mentality of an Aquino organization, she
pontificates: "What is black can be called 'white' but it cannot turn white by
the mere calling."
Her holier-than-thou posture so typical of Mr. Aquino's yellow crowd has
irritated justices so much that one wrote that Sereno "has no right to preach at
the expense of the majority" since she herself committed plagiarism, and that
she allegedly had not reported in her SALN the P25 million she earned as counsel
in the international airport arbitration case.
She demonstrated a Doberman's trait of unrelenting fury against its master's
enemy when she claimed in one dissenting opinion that Arroyo is responsible for
extrajudicial killings in the country, for which she should be charged.
It is De Lima's defiance of the Court's temporary restraining order on the
ban against Arroyo's travel which bolsters suspicions that Sereno—unethically
and perhaps even illegally—acted as Mr. Aquino's fifth-column, and even his
mole, in the Court.
De Lima's defiance of the Court's TRO was not due to, as my colleague
attorney Pangalangan termed it, her "fearless stand." De Lima was obviously
coached that there was a technicality she could use to justify her defiance of
the TRO.
The technicality was that the TRO's second condition required the Arroyos'
Special Power of Attorney designating a legal representative who would, among
other things, "receive summons." However, the SPA the Arroyos issued instead had
that phrase as "produce summons." That was obviously a clerical mistake—private
parties do not produce summons, courts do—which was immediately corrected.
Now who would have immediate access to the SPA the Arroyos submitted, see the
clerical error, and realize that it could be used as technicality for De Lima to
defy the Court's order, buying time for her to get a Pasay court to issue an
arrest order that would make the TRO moot? And who could immediately relay this
information to De Lima? I can only suspect Aquino's first appointee to the
court, Sereno.
Sereno's public disclosures of the Court's internal matters has outraged the
justices so much, that justice Roberto Abad ended his concurring opinion,
obviously mad: "If our deliberations cannot remain confidential, we might as
well close down business."
In his vindictiveness against Arroyo, Mr. Aquino is wrecking havoc on the
Supreme Court—and our Constitution.
Chief News Editor: Sol Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2012 by PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All
rights reserved
PHILIPPINE
HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/phnotweet
This is the PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE (PHNO) Mailing List.
To stop receiving our news items, please send a blank e-mail addressed to: phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Please visit our homepage at: http://www.newsflash.org/
(c) Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
phno-digest@yahoogroups.com
phno-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
