DESPERATION
MANILA, JANUARY 26, 2012 (STAR) AS I WRECK
THIS CHAIR By William M. Esposo - The defense panel in the impeachment trial of
Supreme Court (SC) Chief Justice (CJ) Renato Corona must be getting desperate
already.
On the surface, the less seasoned prosecution panel appears to be overwhelmed
by their more senior counterparts, led by no less than former SC Justice Serafin
Cuevas.
However, the examination of what each side has accomplished, and failed to
accomplish thus far, would tell another tale.
The move of defense panel lawyer Jose Roy III to charge Senator-Judge
Franklin Drilon of "lawyering" for the prosecution, which was later escalated to
a call by the defense panel for Drilon to inhibit, is a tell tale sign of
desperation in the ranks of the defense lawyers.
Presiding officer, Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile (JPE), has debunked
Roy's assertion and reiterated the right of Senator-Judges to seek information
and clarification at any time during the trial. The defense conveniently forgets
that the objective of the trial is to simply know the truth.
Roy's interest conditions him to perceive any act by Senator-Judge Drilon as
partial if it helps the prosecutors.
Former senator Kit Tatad is similarly disposed. Tatad had earlier ventilated
views against the impeachment move.
In the case of Roy, he would have been better appreciated if he clarified the
issue with Drilon one-on-one instead of going public with it through media.
Perhaps the defense is trying to reduce the number of Senator-Judges whom they
think might vote in favor of the prosecution.
Why should Roy charge Senator-Judge Drilon as "lawyering" for the prosecution
if indeed the defense panel is overwhelming the prosecutors?
Roy stood to antagonize other Senator-Judges by questioning their
prerogatives.
Fiercely anti-Corona folks could similarly charge Senator-Judge Chiz Escudero
as "lawyering" for the defense because of those questions that he posed last
Thursday on Article II, which to them might appear to favor the defense.
Escudero asked the prosecutors as to how the Senator-Judges should treat
Article II — if they'll judge each charge individually or apply the 2 out of 3
sports competition standard. Escudero shouldn't have raised that question to the
prosecutors because that's something that they, the Senator-Judges, should
determine and set as the rule.
Going by the core issue of betrayal of public trust, it would seem to Juan
dela Cruz that if only one charge in Article II had been proved — then that
would suffice to remove the CJ from the SC.
Several lawyers support that and even opined that if only one charge in
Article II went only as far as raise serious doubts on the CJ's character and
trustworthiness — then that would suffice to remove him from public office
permanently.
There are marked differences between the rules of an impeachment trial (which
determines fitness for public office) versus that of a criminal or a civil court
that imposes jail sentence or rewards damage claims. Impeachment trials allow
more leeway for accepting testimonies and evidence.
To Juan dela Cruz, it would appear that the defense panel is relying on
technicalities in order to prevent the presentation of evidence. Juan dela Cruz
— the people of the Philippines — wonders what's the big fuss about Article II's
heading?
Plain common sense tells us that you cannot fit the poetry and romance of a
Romeo and Juliet in its title. You have to read the content to get its full
value. It's the content of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet that made it a classic
piece of literature — not its title (heading).
Serafin Cuevas can cite all the laws to support his assertions on this issue
but he cannot stop Juan dela Cruz from perceiving that this type of defense
strategy is meant to protect the guilty.
The timeline of events shows that after the SALNs (Statement of assets and
liabilities and net worth) of CJ Corona were submitted as evidence last
Wednesday, the defense started acting as if its case for acquitting the CJ was
dealt a serious blow. It was after this development when the defense started to
become boorish and picked on Senator-Judge Drilon.
Even the witnesses who are the custodians of the titles of the cited
properties of CJ Corona were not spared from the harassment of the defense
panel.
All that's needed to be established is that these witnesses be identified and
confirmed as the duly tasked custodians of these public documents that are now
being presented as pieces of evidence. Cuevas made it appear as if these
custodians are being made to look like authorities on what are stated in the
documents.
To Juan dela Cruz that strategy of Cuevas translates to diverting the issue.
JPE clearly stated on the opening day that the impeachment trial's objective
is to determine if CJ Renato Corona is fit to still remain in the Supreme Court
or hold any other public office.
The only outcome to be expected from the impeachment process is removal from
public office and not a jail sentence or the payment of moral damages.
In the impeachment trial, the rules of court, criminal and civil, are only
suppletory, and cannot be fully applied as what the defense panel is trying to
impose on the impeachment court and impress in the public mind.
Chief News Editor: Sol Jose Vanzi
© Copyright, 2012 by PHILIPPINE
HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE
All rights reserved
PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS
ONLINE [PHNO] WEBSITE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/phnotweet
This is the PHILIPPINE HEADLINE NEWS ONLINE (PHNO) Mailing List.
To stop receiving our news items, please send a blank e-mail addressed to: phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Please visit our homepage at: http://www.newsflash.org/
(c) Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phno/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
phno-digest@yahoogroups.com
phno-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
phno-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
